Subject	I think it's a valid question.
Posted by	not4resaleZ on April 12, 2010 at 5:22 PM
	This message has been viewed 88 times.
In Reply To	When you come up with a cheap way to posted by Jehannum on April 12, 2010 at 03:13 PM
Message	I'm not intending to increase boost to more than others are boosting. I intend to use a fuel that uses less air in it's chemical reaction; less air per unit of energy released. I do have 740cc injectors and they should flow enough for 500whp.
Follow Ups	Flex Fuel Z32 - not4resaleZ 10:07:43 04/12/10 Re: Flex Fuel Z32 - NytWolf 10:48:34 04/12/10 You get lower MPG because of the lower energy content - not4resaleZ 11:07:25 04/12/10 MPG is not a measure of efficiency. - Jehannum 11:10:42 04/12/10 "30% more fuel" required - LJZTT 12:16:01 04/12/10 why not just have a seperate tune for E-85? - FuerGrissa 12:16:54 04/12/10 It would be nice to not have to worry about having different - not4resaleZ 13:50:04 04/12/10 All this negativity.... You need this - kickerzx 14:43:59 04/12/10 And of course, adjust timing. not just fueling.. (n/m) - kickerzx 14:53:18 04/12/10 Thanks for the advice. I like BDE rails, but already have - not4resaleZ 15:44:59 04/12/10 When you come up with a cheap way to - Jehannum 15:13:19 04/12/10 Newer injectors - No problem. (n/m) - kickerzx 15:17:46 04/12/10 Newer injectors are just as susceptible - Jehannum 15:24:06 04/12/10 I think it's a valid question. - not4resaleZ 17:22:50 04/12/10 Are you sure it uses less air per unit of energy released? (n/m) - collegeboy 17:34:33 04/12/10 Using stoich ratios of 9.765 and 14.7 and energy contents - not4resaleZ 19:06:38 04/12/10 Here are the numbers I got from googleing NASIOC e85 - not4resaleZ 19:23:41 04/12/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.